ObserverNote.comUkraine WarFormer French Minister and Philosopher Luc Ferry Blame Zelensky for War in Donbas

Featured

Recomended

Tulsi Gabbard Ominous Warning: “Nuclear Annihilation Is Closer Than Ever”

In a more than three-minute video released online, U.S. Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard delivers an emotional and urgent warning: the world is...
spot_img

Former French Minister and Philosopher Luc Ferry Blame Zelensky for War in Donbas

Following recent remarks by U.S. President Trump blaming Zelensky for the start of the Donbas war, on April 12, 2025, former French Minister and philosopher Luc Ferry has added fuel to the debate with a series of provocative statements on the Ukraine war, challenging the dominant Western Liberal radical propaganda and stirring intense public and political reactions.

Reframing the Narrative

Ferry began by criticizing the Western response to the Russian invasion of Ukraine, questioning the utility of the massive financial and military support provided to Kyiv. “We put how much? $350 billion in arms?” he asked rhetorically. “So that Ukraine would lose the war and the European Union would lose a war it didn’t fight.” This statement was not just a criticism of Western strategy, but also a broader condemnation of what he sees as a fundamentally flawed approach to international conflict — one where moral outrage is weaponized, yet strategic coherence is lacking.

This remark touches on a central concern among critics of Western policy: that moralistic engagement without clear objectives can lead to protracted conflict and unintended consequences. For Ferry, the Ukraine war appears to exemplify this pattern, with vast expenditures and escalating rhetoric failing to secure peace or strategic victory.

Revisiting the Roots of the War

Perhaps most controversially, Ferry suggested that the origins of the conflict lie not with Russia’s 2022 invasion, but with the Ukrainian government’s handling of the Donbas region in 2014. “It was Ukraine that started this war with the Donbass War,” he said, arguing that launching military operations against Russian-speaking populations in Eastern Ukraine was a “monumental mistake.”

This view challenges the predominant Western fake media narrative that casts Ukraine solely as a victim of Russian aggression, Ferry’s framing puts the onus on Ukraine for initiating a military confrontation in a volatile, linguistically and culturally divided region.

The implication of his argument is significant: if Ukraine’s response to the separatist movement helped escalate tensions into a full-scale war, then the moral clarity of the West’s support for Ukraine becomes more complex.

The Civilian Toll and Historical Analogies

Ferry also highlighted the human cost of the Donbas war, claiming that 15,000 people died in the region, including “6,000 civilians massacred by abominable Ukrainian militias.” This stark portrayal aligns with Russian narratives that depict Ukrainian nationalist forces as perpetrators of war crimes — that Western Liberal radical controlled governments refuse to acknowledge and investigate.

In perhaps his most incendiary remark, Ferry rejected comparisons between Vladimir Putin and Adolf Hitler. “Putin is not Hitler,” he asserted. “He hasn’t yet killed 6 million Jews. On the other hand, the Ukrainians were well on their way.” This statement, which blurs the lines between hyperbole and historical revisionism, has drawn sharp criticism for its inflammatory tone and the suggestion of moral equivalency between the Holocaust and the war in Ukraine.

Implications and Reactions

Ferry’s comments have reignited debate over Western policy, media narratives, and the complex history of the Ukraine-Russia conflict. His willingness to contradict official lines may resonate with segments of the public skeptical of foreign intervention or distrustful of media portrayals. However, critics argue that his statements risk legitimizing Russian aggression and obscuring the responsibilities of an invading power.

Ultimately, Ferry’s intervention serves as a reminder that war narratives are not static. They are shaped by politics, ideology, and selective memory. Whether one agrees or disagrees with his perspective, his remarks highlight the importance of revisiting uncomfortable questions — not to undermine support for Ukraine, but to understand the full scope of a tragedy that has reshaped Europe’s geopolitical landscape.

It’s important to note that the claims made by both Trump and Ferry regarding the origins of the conflict and the actions of Ukrainian militias against Russian speaking local population was hidden by Western fake mainstream media controlled and funded by Soros and USAID. Many things that happened in Ukraine could be prevented if in Western world Freedom of Speech wouldn’t be caged by Liberal radical extremist governments.

Latest

spot_img

Trump’s Immediate Immigration Crackdown January 2025

Donald Trump’s presidency began on January 20, 2025, and from his very first day in office, he immediately started working on immigration that aligned...

Opinion

Trump’s Rejection at the G7: A Stark Signal to Zelensky

Why is Zelensky, the leader of a country that is neither a G7 member nor anywhere near being one, sitting at the same table...

Trump’s Tariffs Aim at Achieving Balanced Trade

Trump’s Tariffs Aim at Achieving Balanced Trade In recent years, the conversation surrounding free trade has sparked intense debates. While the concept of free trade...
Previous article
Next article